• About

affecognitive

~ religion, film, affect, academia

affecognitive

Monthly Archives: November 2016

Moonlight: Entrapment and Affective subjectivation

29 Tuesday Nov 2016

Posted by mghamner in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Film reviews of Moonlight (Barry Jenkins, 2016) praise its treatment of identity, but the title suggests the film is more precisely about subjectivation, that is, the social, material, and affective forces that shape the sense, limits, and horizons of “selfhood”.

la-1470932681-snap-embed-embed  Consider first the film’s most iconic and most exceptional scene in which Juan (Mahershala Ali) teaches Little (Alex R. Hibbert) how to swim in the ocean. Though it is shot in medium and close frame, the scene is incredibly capacious. Daylight floods the screen and the ocean seems to go on endlessly around them and behind them. The openness comments on the achieved tenderness between them. Their two bodies do not seem lost or precarious but buoyed and steady. The intimacy is palpable, drawn out in the ability of two male bodies to be close and trusting and held.

Later that evening Juan and Little are sitting on a bench near the beach in a scene more ordinary for this film, shot with tight spatial dynamics that keep a chokehold on the landscape and its inhabitants. The openness of the ocean is here off-screen and barely heard—as it is for most of the film. Juan tells Little that he’s Cuban. Before viewers can absorb that affective dissonance (Juan seems black and American, not hispanic and Cuban), Juan relates the memory of an old Cuban lady telling him that, “in moonlight, black boys look blue. You’re blue. That’s what I’m going to call you: Blue.”

When Little asks with the straight deductive logic of children, “Is your name Blue?” Juan answers in a way that boomerangs out to the film’s title and reframes its events and trajectories: “Nah,” he replies, “At some point, you have to decide for yourself who you’re going to be. Can’t let nobody make that decision for you.”[Quotation from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4975722/trivia?tab=qt&ref_=tt_trv_qu].

It is a sentence that might seem to reaffirm a liberal sense of core identity and the individual’s ability—even obligation—to choose, to decide, who and what to be in the world. But the scene, the memory, and the conversation introduce a fundamental ambivalence to this ideology of American individualism, since even if Juan decides not to be Blue, he still is seen as Blue by the people around him.

Whatever he decides to be, it is a decision emerging out of conditions, perspectives, and responses he did not choose. That oscillation—or seepage—between layered material-affective situations and the layered affective materiality of the self is as endless as the grains of sand, as diffuse as moonlight.

11-moonlight-w1200-h630  The accumulated effect is entrapment. Indeed the adult Chiron, who goes by “Black”(Travonte Rhodes) answers Kevin’s (André Holland) question about who he is with this very word. “Straight up?” he warns Kevin, who dismisses the warning and urges him to speak. “Trapped,” he offers in acute summation.

The film’s minimalist dialogue perfectly reflects and enacts the entrapments of Black and Kevin. If this were a film about finding one’s true self, then this inner truth would need to find expression in words and actions. But that is not this film. The silences between the characters, their stuttered, torn, and inept linguistic exchanges, leave viewers grasping to fill in the gaps affectively, not representationally. Our eyes can’t help but rove from the men to the neighborhoods, streets, buildings, rooms, walls, and furniture that constitute the material situations and contexts and signify the affective economies by which these men are seen and which trap them as surely as does any ‘chosen’ course of action.

Even though Black remakes himself from the ground up after his incarceration, the blocks of that refashioning could only rearrange the bars of a social prison buoyed by poverty, racism, neglect, and homophobia. The film’s persistently referenced dyad of “soft” and “hard” that puts color and flesh on what it is to be a “man” turns and twists around this social prison, and never quite settles out into the lived intimacy and capaciousness of that one scene with Juan.

20151113_193323_Moonlight_D23_0117.tif

And yet. If this is not a film of hope, at least it is not a film that glorifies despair.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • More
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Graduate Mentoring

01 Tuesday Nov 2016

Posted by mghamner in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Yesterday I attended two panels of a multi-session workshop on graduate mentoring that was beautifully organized by Glenn Wright at the SU Graduate School. The first discussed best practices for mentors and the second, run by Paula Chambers, laid out her “Virtual PhD” advocacy for counseling PhD students toward non-academic positions.

The takeaway from the best practices is that good mentoring emerges out of frequent meetings and consistent, concrete feedback. I was particularly struck by the weekly meeting Joanna Masingila, Dean, School of Education runs for her doctoral students. From my Humanities neck of the woods, I’d call this meeting a “proseminar”. Students register for it and receive zero to three credits, depending on where they are in the program. Students who are analyzing data or writing prospectuses or grants can register for 2-3 credits, while those gathering data or reading through bibliographies register for 1 credit. Students still in coursework are required to attend but receive zero credits. Each Monday, Joanna reported, one student sends out a chapter or a set of analyzed data, and each Friday (3:45-4:45 p.m.) the group meets with faculty to discuss what was sent out. The meeting works not only to model genre (this is what a dissertation prospectus looks like, this is what a grant proposal looks like) but also to incarnate departmental support and the necessary collective dimension of any academic success.

The Virtual PhD discussion left me less satisfied. I broached the session fully on board with the need to counsel students toward alt-ac teloi for their doctorates. But Paula seemed to respond to academic disdain for the corporate world with non-academic disdain for the focus, time, energy and passion required to become successful in the academy. The edge in her voice was a bit distracting considering her audience (faculty and staff dedicated to mentoring grad students). Clearly, Humanities mentors are deluded and even cruel if they refuse to vocalize their support for non-TT jobs. I’d even say that every departmental professionalization program needs to establish regular alt-ac discussions in their programming. But this support for considering and pursuing a wide range of post-doctoral employment must be balanced with an insistence that departmental training simply is what it is–regardless of what one ends up doing with the degree. The desire to work for an NGO or the State Department is fantastic but cannot be used as the excuse for not fully engaging with the intellectual, pedagogical, and programmatic offerings of the department. My support for a student’s interest in digital humanities or curriculum development is different from my feeling obligated to suggest that all students develop IT or administrative skills because they are imminently desired by “the market.”

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • More
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: